April 7, 2014
MAKING THE CASE FOR HUMANITY
The Legal Aid Society, the nation's oldest and largest not-for-profit legal services organization, is more than a law firm for low-income clients. It is an indispensable component of the legal, social, and economic fabric of New York City - passionately advocating for low-income individuals and families across a variety of civil, criminal and juvenile rights matters, while also fighting for legal reform. Through a network of borough, neighborhood, and courthouse offices in 26 locations in New York City, the Society provides comprehensive legal services in all five boroughs of New York City for clients who cannot afford to pay for private counsel.Annually, the Society handles some 300,000 cases and legal matters for clients and its law reform work benefits some two million low-income families and individuals in New York City and the landmark rulings in many of these cases have a State-wide and national impact. The Legal Aid Society takes on more cases for more clients than any other legal services organization in the United States. And it brings a depth and breadth of perspective that is unmatched in the legal profession. The Legal Aid Society's unique value is an ability to go beyond any one case to create more equitable outcomes for individuals and broader, more powerful systemic change for society as a whole.
Legal Aid in the News
Steven Banks Leaves The Legal Aid Society After 33 Years To Head The City's Human Resources Administration Under Mayor de Blasio
After a 33-year legal career devoted to fighting for low-income New Yorkers, Steven Banks left The Legal Aid Society to become the Commissioner of the New York City Human Resources Administration. Mayor de Blasio announced the appointment saying that Steve "has been a voice for the voiceless in this city." Banks has served as the Society's Attorney-in-Chief since 2004, after rising through the ranks of the organization from a law student intern and a staff attorney to a series of major leadership positions.
Lorraine McEvilley Appointed Director of Parole Revocation Defense Unit
Seymour James, Jr., Attorney-in-Charge of the Criminal Practice, announced the appointment of Lorraine McEvilley as the Director of The Legal Aid Society's Parole Revocation Defense Unit. A graduate of SUNY Buffalo and SUNY Buffalo School of Law, Lorraine first joined the Society as a staff attorney in our Queens criminal defense office in 1989. After distinguishing herself in Queens, Lorraine relocated to Arizona where she represented community members in civil claims and criminal tribal court proceedings with Four Rivers Indian Legal Services, and than represented clients facing felony charges with the Office of the Public Defender in Maricopa County. Lorraine returned to the Society in 1999 as a staff attorney in our Manhattan criminal defense office and subsequently transferred to the Parole Revocation Defense Unit in 2005. In 2008, she became a supervising attorney in PRDU and has been a critical member of the team which further raised the level of parole revocation advocacy at Legal Aid. The Unit continues to serve as a model for clients charged with violations of the terms of their release to community supervision. In 2011, Lorraine was awarded the Orison S. Marden Award for excellence and dedication to the work and clients of The Legal Aid Society.
Queens Neighborhood Office Honored By Assemblymember Kim
State Assemblymember Ron Kim honored The Legal Aid Society for its work in Queens, providing free legal services and workshops for the community. The lawmaker presented a New York State Citation to Sateesh Nori, the Attorney-in-Charge of the Queens Neighborhood Office. Assemblymember Kim said that he and Legal Aid "worked together to host workshops and bi-weekly legal counseling services" at the lawmaker's office "for those who cannot afford legal help in Flushing. Through this partnership, The Legal Aid Society provided pro bono legal services to underserved working families on issues such as housing, consumer protection and tenantlandlord disputes."
Legal Aid's Favorable Settlement For Domino's Workers Continues To Receive Media Coverage; New York Law Journal Publishes Essay On Joint Employer Liability For Franchisors Written By Legal Aid Staff Attorneys
The New York Law Journal has published an essay entitled "Domino's Challenges Joint Employer Liability for Franchisors" by Hollis Pfitsch and Richard Blum, who are Staff Attorneys in The Legal Aid Society's Civil Practice Employment Law Unit. The essay focuses on a recent major federal court settlement in which delivery workers in four Domino's pizza restaurants in Manhattan are receiving payments totaling nearly $1.3 million for unpaid wages. Ms. Pfitsch and Mr. Blum were members of the Legal Aid litigation team in Cano v. DPNY in which Shearman & Sterling LLP served as pro bono counsel. As described in their Law Journal essay, "while the original lawsuit was against a franchise and individual franchise owners and managers, Domino's Pizza Inc., the international corporation, was successfully added to the lawsuit in a motion to amend seeking liability of Domino's as a joint employer. While rare, the case applied well-settled principles of joint employment under wage and hour law to bring in the franchisor."
Seymour James Honored By Boston University School Of Law
Seymour James, Attorney-in-Charge of the Criminal Practice at The Legal Aid Society, was honored for contributions to the legal community by Boston University School of Law. The alumni award was presented to James at a special reception by Maureen A. O'Rourke, Dean of Boston University School of Law. James, former President of the New York State Bar Association, is a graduate of BU Law and has been at the Society for the past 40 years.
Drawing Upon Its Extensive Experience In Litigating False And Involuntary Confession Cases, Legal Aid's Criminal Appeals Bureau Submitted Amicus Brief In Landmark Thomas Case
Chief Judge Jonathan Lippman, writing for a unanimous New York Court of Appeals, concluded that the confession that the police had elicited from Adrian Thomas after a 9 and a half-hour interrogation was involuntary and had to be suppressed. In 2009, Thomas had been convicted of second-degree murder in connection with the death of his four-month old son and had been sentenced to a prison term of 25-years to life. His conviction was affirmed by the Appellate Division, Third Department. Because the case presented critical issues regarding the kinds of tactics that may be permissibly employed by the police in interrogating suspects, the Criminal Appeals Bureau of The Legal Aid Society, drawing upon its extensive experience in litigating false and involuntary confession cases, submitted a comprehensive amicus brief on Thomas's behalf. From the outset, the medical evidence in the case was highly equivocal. The prosecution contended that the child had died from intracranial injuries. Defense experts, in contrast, in line with the original emergency room diagnosis, testified that the child, who had been born prematurely, had died of sepsis. In the absence of any other significant witnesses, Thomas's confession was the centerpiece of the prosecution's case.
In Article 78 Proceeding Judge Finds in Favor of Legal Aid Juvenile Rights Practice Client, Ordering ACS to Pay for Transgender Surgery
New York County Supreme Court Judge Peter H. Moulton agreed with The Legal Aid Society's Juvenile Rights Practice in an Article 78 proceeding regarding a transgendered client and ordered the City's Administration for Children to pay for all the client's gender affirming surgeries. In October 2013, ACS determined that JRP's client was not eligible for medical procedures which would address her diagnosis of gender dysphoria and allow her to conform her appearance to her female gender identity. While ACS did not contest her gender dysphoria, despite much evidence supporting the medical procedures including a positive recommendation by ACS' own Health Review Committee, ACS denied the procedures based partly on the report of one independent doctor who, without meeting with the client, stated that the client would not comply with the post-operative procedures.
|The Legal Aid Society
Newsletter is written and edited by Pat Bath, Director of
with technical assistance from Jason Smallwood, Web Developer
|© 2014 The Legal Aid Society | 199 Water Street, New York, NY 10038 | www.legal-aid.org|